• Lightspeed
  • Posts
  • ❓ FTX didn’t know about Backpack

❓ FTX didn’t know about Backpack

When Backpack bought FTX EU, it was news to all of us — including FTX

Howdy!

Writing about FTX these past couple days got me thinking about how there haven’t been too many crypto bankruptcies in the past couple years. Someone should start a “no bankruptcies” clock and see how long it goes. 

Today, we’ve got news on the Bacquisition, pump.fun revenue, and a Jito DAO proposal update.

FTX didn’t know Backpack bought its EU arm

On Tuesday, we reported that Backpack had purchased FTX EU in a $32.7 million deal. The next day, FTX put out a statement clarifying Backpack’s announcement. Then in a press release of its own, Backpack clarified FTX’s clarification. 

This is how companies fight, I guess. 

Here’s the crux of it all: What’s left of FTX said it wasn’t aware that Backpack bought FTX EU, and it swore off responsibility for the repayment of FTX EU customers and said it can't verify whether what Backpack is saying is true. Backpack responded by saying that much of the saga leading up to its FTX EU acquisition had already been reported, and it would be renaming FTX EU to Backpack EU before it begins doling out customer claims.

The dueling press releases seem to stem from some bad blood FTX still has with FTX EU. FTX sued its European arm to try and claw back some of the $323 million Sam Bankman-Fried spent for the startup. The suit ended in a settlement whereby FTX EU’s original founders Patrick Gruhn and Robin Matzke bought back FTX EU for $32.7 million. Backpack then bought FTX EU from Gruhn and Matzke, and the ownership shares are apparently awaiting transfer.

Backpack failed to elucidate this whole chain of events in its original press release, but it also doesn’t materially change much. Whether Backpack bought FTX EU from FTX or from the people who bought it from FTX, the basic fact remains that Backpack owns the asset.

Still, the sale itself remains a bit weird, at least to my mind. Backpack told me it bought FTX EU in April 2024 for $32.7 million. That’s just a month or two after FTX EU’s founders bought the company back for that exact price as part of a lawsuit settlement. At the time, FTX reportedly concluded that “no other buyer would agree to purchase” FTX EU. 

It doesn’t seem very business savvy for Backpack to pay the full $32.7 million for an exchange that no one else apparently wanted — and which was sold in a court settlement. Couldn’t they have asked for a few million off the sticker price just for getting it off Gruhn and Matzke’s hands? It’s also just a large amount for a startup like Backpack to pay: The project reportedly lost much of its funding in the FTX collapse, and it only raised $17 million in its last funding round. Where did it get $32.7 million to spend on FTX EU? Backpack did not return my request for comment on the financial side of the deal. 

In any event, FTX seems to be nitpicking the Backpack press release, the broad strokes of which don’t appear to warrant much doubt. But we’re talking about FTX here, so it just makes sense things wouldn’t go as smoothly as planned.

— Jack Kubinec

I’m surprised pump.fun’s lead in the fastest to $100 million chart isn’t wider, honestly:

I just recorded a Lightspeed podcast episode with Syncracy Capital’s Ryan Watkins, so I came across this chart he put out a couple of months ago.

It’s crazy to see just how quickly pump.fun took off — although the rest of the chart is somewhat of a cautionary tale. When was the last time you heard about Convex, Curve or SushiSwap?

— Jack Kubinec

Jito DAO wrapped up 2024 with a swath of governance updates focused on decentralization, liquidity stability, and efficiency. Proposal JIP-8 introduced the TipRouter Node Consensus Network to handle decentralized MEV tip distribution, allocating fees to the DAO treasury and participants while granting governance more control over upgrades and fee structures. JIP-9 established the Interceptor Liquidity Defense program to protect JitoSOL liquidity pools from destabilizing trading patterns, addressing key risks to liquidity.

Governance processes were streamlined with JIP-11, which reduced the discussion period for proposals and extended the voting window, improving decision-making efficiency while maintaining inclusivity. JIP-12 defined parameters for integrating JTO staking vaults and Vault Receipt Tokens into governance, emphasizing flexibility and fair weight distribution for high-market-cap VRTs. JIP-13 proposed a 2025 incentive budget to drive liquidity mining and DeFi growth, with performance tied to clear metrics and any unspent funds returned to the treasury.

Takeaway: For users, these updates promise a more stable and efficient Jito ecosystem, with stronger protections for liquidity and new opportunities for staking and governance participation.

— Jeffrey Albus

A message from Mike Hudack, co-founder and CEO of Sling Money: