🛥️ Ship happens

No-code app creation is great until it isn’t

Howdy!

Today we have our first ever referral shoutout! Thank you Black Sea Gold SOL Validator for spreading the good word about Lightspeed. Their chosen link can be found here

Do you want a shoutout and link of your choice in the Lightspeed header? Use this link to refer three friends to sign up, and we’ll give you some of this precious inbox real estate.

Today, we’ve got a thought piece on vibe coding, Solana’s REV spike, and “the largest Solana Protocol change ever.”

Vibe coding the future

If you want to build in Web3, you've pretty much always needed to know how to code. Not necessarily at an elite level, but at least a baseline understanding. That plus lots of late nights, semicolon-heavy syntax, compiler errors, and a burly stack of ever-open documentation tabs.

The technical barrier was part of the culture.

Gatekeeping, maybe, but also a necessary filter in an ecosystem where one misplaced line in a smart contract could drain a treasury. That filter is eroding fast these days, however.

Brace yourselves, friends. We've now entered the era of vibe coding. The term, coined by computer scientist Andrej Karpathy, refers to a novel AI-native coding style where developers (and perhaps more importantly, non-developers) describe what they want and, at the click of a button, an LLM generates a working iteration of their request.

Tools like Cursor, Dev.fun and Poof.new are already lowering the floor, turning ideas into dApps with a few lines of stumbling prose. A Poof co-founder told Lightspeed that vibe coders have created over 2,000 apps on the platform since its open beta started on Thursday.

But, of course, there's a dark side to every moon. Because if it's easier than ever to build something legitimate, it's also easier than ever to build something that only has the appearance of legitimacy.

The ICO boom of 2017 gave us a glimpse of this dynamic. Once the profit motive was clear, hundreds of anonymous teams emerged from the woodwork to spin up faux white papers and (usually crap) landing pages. They promised revolutionary tech, launched tokens, raised millions, and vanished into vapor.

Now imagine that, but times infinity. Imagine some clown throwing up an LLM-generated codebase, a slick AI-generated branding package, wholly believable GitHub activity, a world-class website UI with Web3 login, and then getting his fake chatbot founders to do some live AMAs.

Honeypot contracts with backdoors, phishing sites that buoy authentic functionality as an indicator of legitimacy, mint buttons that seed approvals you don't notice till your wallet is drained — the potential for bad actors runs deep.

Once things really get going, reputation systems and persistent identities will likely be the only hope we have of ever trusting another product. Proof-of-humanity systems, social graphs and third-party attestations will form the backbone of trust in an AI-coded world in Web3 and beyond.

We'll need open auditing tools built for non-coders, and sandbox environments that simulate contract behavior before anything hits mainnet. Smart contract registries could begin to mirror app store models, with verified publishers, community ratings, and AI-generated trust scores.

The responsibility won't just fall on users — it'll sit with platforms, protocols, and indeed, the vibe coders themselves.

But even with those risks, even with the inevitable rough edges, something big is happening here. We've spent years saying Web3 is about empowering creators. Now it actually can be.

Not just for the technically minded or the crypto native.

The poet, the game designer, the high school kid with a better idea for an auction format or voting platform — they can actually build. And if we establish proper protection early enough, the best ideas may finally have a chance to win. Not because they raise the most capital but because they exist — functional, forkable, live.

— Jeffrey Albus

In six weeks, the people building crypto’s backbone will be in one place.

Permissionless IV isn’t for panels full of fluff — it’s for engineers, founders and researchers pushing real code, systems and primitives into production.

  • Peter Todd (OpenTimestamps) — building verifiable proof into Bitcoin’s DNA

  • Alex Blania (Tools for Humanity) — scaling biometric identity for onchain access

  • Illia Polosukhin (NEAR Protocol) — bridging AI x crypto with real infrastructure

Infra, identity, trust, scalability — it’s all on the table. And the ones driving it? Already booked for Brooklyn.

The “Does REV matter?” debate sprang back up online the moment Solana began to separate itself from the pack:

Solana brought in some $40 million from tips and fees paid to use the blockchain last week, lapping its next closest competitors in Tron ($14.5 million) and Ethereum ($12.5 million).

After an uninspiring few weeks, Solana’s REV spiked on the back of Believe, a buzzy and somewhat controversial new memecoin launchpad

— Jack Kubinec

Today is the first day of Scale or Die, the developer-focused half of Solana’s Accelerate conference in New York.

Solana’s developer shop Anza didn’t bury the lede: On day one, they came out and announced a new consensus protocol named Alpenglow — which Anza’s X account dubbed “the largest Solana Protocol change ever.”

Supposedly, it was standing room only for Anza’s talk introducing the new protocol (I was not present because nobody ever tells me anything), and folks I’m talking to here seem to find it encouraging that Solana is trying to further scale the L1 — especially because competition is heating up among high-performance blockchains. 

Alpenglow makes proof-of-history obsolete on Solana — a sentimental moment if, like me, proof-of-history was the first thing you heard about Solana before topblasting SOL in 2021. 

A new mechanism called Votor will take its place, handling voting and block finalization. Votor also introduces a new way for validators to communicate with one another. 

Solana’s current block finality time — defined here as the time it takes for ⅔ of stake to share a common root for a block — is about 12.8 seconds. Anza says Alpenglow will shrink this time span to a median of 150 milliseconds, which would remarkably put the globally distributed blockchain on par with Web2 infrastructure in terms of responsiveness.

— Jack

A message from Robin A. Nordnes, founder and CEO of Raiku: