- Lightspeed
- Posts
- 🥲 Token investing is difficult
🥲 Token investing is difficult
Pump acquires Padre, not $PADRE

Brought to you by:
hello
Happy Monday! Crypto markets are awashed in green and SOL is back at $200, which means to say the long-awaited “Uptober” may be finally here. Better late than never, I suppose.
Pump acquires Padre, not $PADRE
One recurring theme in crypto is that token holders keep discovering that they don’t have the same protection rights as shareholders.
Legal protections make M&A a smooth process. For instance, if BigCo acquires LittleCo for $1 per share, the people who own LittleCo’s shares should get $1 per share. The acquirer is buying the company, and the shares are the company, so the shareholders get bought. No investor is left behind. There are exceptions, but that is generally “supposed” to be the way it works under traditional financial laws.
Crypto land, however, has its own rules.
Various efforts exist to mitigate this problem, like MetaDAO’s futarchy markets or the Blockworks Token Transparency reports. But the default for now is mostly to just vibe it out on Twitter.
Pump acquires Padre
Pump announced its acquisition of Padre last Friday. Padre is a trading terminal with about 4% market share on Solana (it’s also on BNB Chain, Base and Ethereum).

Padre also has a PADRE token of its own. Why does a trading terminal have a token? I don’t know. The token confers things like fee discounts and access to features, which is nice, but not the same as “owning Padre,” which is a different thing.
Unfortunately for the PADRE investors who raised ~$1.7 million on Fjord Foundry 19 months ago, that token will “no longer have utility on the platform with no further plans for the future,” as per Pump’s acquisition announcement.

Source: X
PADRE token holders got upset and complaints of classic rugging ensued, with some alleging the team was banning Discord users for speaking the unspeakable thing about ownership rights.
You can see below that PADRE’s price tanked 80% moments after the acquisition was made public.

This wouldn’t happen in an alternate universe where crypto tokens are governed by the same laws as TradFi.
But in crypto land, if the token you own is adjacent to the company that gets bought, and that token doesn’t give you cash consideration, then the rational thing to do for the PADRE holder, upon learning their adjacency, is to be extremely adjacent and sell.
In any case, the ruckus on Twitter seems to have prompted teams to take action.
Just this morning, Padre announced that PADRE token holders will be compensated with PUMP tokens, based on a snapshot from Friday, Oct. 24, 2025.
A snapshot was taken of all $PADRE holders at 13:59 UTC on Friday, October 24th 2025.
These holders are now able to receive a set number of $PUMP tokens which correspond to the value of $PADRE they held at the time of the snapshot. Holders can submit their Solana wallets and
— Padre (@PadreApp)
10:12 PM • Oct 26, 2025
Nice! This is the part where crypto governance is sometimes benevolent.
Still, there’s a valuation problem. If Pump bought Padre for, say, $40 million, and PADRE’s value at the snapshot was ~$5 million, then compensating token holders at market is merely ~13% of what they would’ve gotten as per the deal’s implied equity value.
Shareholders would’ve gotten the $40 million pro rata, as StrategicHash points out.
Wait a second. That's not how M&A is supposed to work.
This is straight up unethical, and would be illegal in traditional finance.
The $PADRE holders deserve to be paid at the pro rata acquisition value (40M?) not at the FDV value at the time of snapshot (5M).
futardio
— StrategicHash (@StrategicHash)
11:52 PM • Oct 26, 2025
Making PADRE holders “whole” at the pre-announcement price is better than nothing, I suppose, but it is also not the same as paying them as if they owned the company, because they do not.
You can think of Pump’s swap as a goodwill gesture, or even a (Padre) customer retention strategy, kind of like if United Airlines gives you 1,000 miles for canceling your flight. But it’s not a legal payout.
Brought to you by:
peaq, the Machine Economy Computer, proudly sponsors the Lightspeed newsletter. The robots are here — and they’re coming onchain. With peaq, you earn while the robots work.
Recent highlights include: World’s first Machine Economy Free Zone in the UAE, World’s first tokenized robo-farm in Hong Kong, World’s first Web3 Robotics SDK, World’s first onchain robot.
New peaq app: Get early access to tokenized robots. Be the world’s first to benefit from the rise of the robots: https://www.peaq.xyz/

Ore is back:

Source: Blockworks Research
Around this time last year, a pseudonymous dev by the name of Hardhat Chad launched Ore, an experimental proof-of-work token that infamously congested the Solana network after it pulled an influx of users betting on the next “no premine, Bitcoin on Solana.”
That token was dead, but tokens on an immutable blockchain are never truly dead. ORE is seeing an explosive resurgence: The token's market cap surged 500% last Thursday, reaching a peak of $62 million before correcting to $32 million.
The revived interest in ORE is thanks to the team’s new gamified mining protocol redesign. You can read all about it here, but the only pertinent change that explains ORE’s recent price action is a new value accrual mechanism that collects ~10% of all SOL mining rewards as revenue to be used as ORE buybacks on the open market.
According to Blockworks Research data, the Ore protocol generated more than $100K in revenue on both Thursday and Friday last week.

